Complex network stitching #2048
Unanswered
skydivine22
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Judging by your use of the word 'donor' I see that you are already aware of our 'merge_network' function in the topotools module? This function kinda works, but was written a long time ago so may be rough around the edges. It does get unit tested on each update, but not exactly 'stress tested'. Anyway, can you confirm whether you've tried this function or not, and if so what problems your having? BTW, a better way to generate multiple scales is to start with a fine network then choose pores to merge into marco-pores. This bottom-up type approach just seems to work better. We used it in this paper. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi!
I'm trying to stitch 3D cubic networks together to simulate different regions of micro-porosity in a main macro network. What I have in mind is that I want to first delete the pores and connections at the region where I want to add the cubic micro-networks, and then stitching a micro-network there. The examples provided only detail stitching a donor network onto one of the 6 boundaries of the main cubic network. I am wondering how to stitch a donor network in the middle of the main network( the space created by the deleted pores/throats). I have attached a very crude 2D drawing to provide some visualisation.
Thanks so much
Andy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18246/18246009c9c18f0898a34bb5fd6bd41929bfc2e8" alt="IMG_116A22DEC58E-1"
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions