Variant pairing question #45
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hi Long Wang, so the code that I have implemented in plotMap_variantPairs is based on the analysis conducted in this paper. Here the number of variant pairs is reduced to the set of characteristic boundary types in the microstructure. All 4 packets show the same set of 6 variants with respect to their specific {111} plane, so in a first step all 24 variants are reduced to only 6 variants, removing the distinction of different {111} planes. Then there are a lot of equivalent boundaries between the 6 variants: the boundary misorientation between V1 and V2 for example is the same as for V3 and V4, and V5 and V6. There are in total 4 different boundary types to be distinguished, which are plotted in Figure 1 c,f, and i of the referenced paper. FIgure 1l shows the equivalency of different variant pairings that has been implemented in the analysis in ORTools. Since the boundary types are dominating the mechanical properties, the analysis of these 4 boundary types should be sufficient, and the study of pairing between all variants not really useful from my understanding. Best wishes |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @wanghaijian217, A new function computeGrainPairs.m has been added to the ORTools Developer to help you calculate grain pairs based on variant, packet, Bain group id OR any other type of user-specified id. The advantage of the last option is that you can now return grain pair information based on equivalent ids or any other type of id that you define. Please see Example 10 for a detailed demonstration on how to use this new function. Hope this helps with your analysis. Warm regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Discussed in #26
Hi, my name is Long Wang. Thank you very much for your reply.
Because I am not familiar with variant pairing, I am based on your code, do not know whether it is correct or not. I don't understand the definition of variant pairs in your code(plotMap_variantPairs.m,ORTools(src)), so can you please explain the derivation of 16 variant pairs(doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.018)?The density and fraction of boundary length of martensitic variant pairs,sunch as V1-V2; V1-V3 (V5); V1-V6; V1-V4;V1-V7；V1-V8;V1-V9(V19) and so on; Can all the remaining variant pairs be supplemented? Sorry to bother you, but I have launched the code myself, but I don't know if it is right. Can you have a look?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions