Problem when calculating variant width #18
-
Hello ORTools team, thank you very much for your very complete add-on and suite of tutorials, they are really helpful. I am having an issue following example7 when using one of my EBSD maps and calculating
All the other functions are working fine, with the example map or with my maps. I suspected the issue was that I have 3 phases indexed (martensite, austenite and Fe3C), but even when only selecting I'm including my import data section for reference, maybe some mistake is made here : %% Load data
% Crystal symmetry w/ Fe3C
CS = {...
'notIndexed',...
crystalSymmetry('m-3m', [2.9 2.9 2.9], 'mineral', 'Iron bcc (old)', 'color', [0.53 0.81 0.98]),...
crystalSymmetry('m-3m', [3.7 3.7 3.7], 'mineral', 'Iron fcc', 'color', [0.56 0.74 0.56]),...
crystalSymmetry('mmm', [5.1 6.8 4.5], 'mineral', 'Fe3C', 'color', [0.85 0.65 0.13])};
% path to files
% pname = '/home/lhostis/MATLAB-ebsd/ORTools-2.0.0';
pname = 'E:\Documents\MATLAB\ORTools-2.0.0';
% which files to be imported
fname = [pname '/EBSD Map Data 6 - EBSD Data Map_001.ctf'];
% create an EBSD variable containing the data
ebsd_bckp = EBSD.load(fname,CS,'interface','ctf',...
'convertEuler2SpatialReferenceFrame') The script and the data are also linked here : |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Dear Jules, I have tried to track your issue down and it is related to our limited focus on microstructures that have retained austenite, i.e. austenite that is not reconstructed from martensite. I have now implemented some bugfixes to make things work for you, you should download the latest ORTools developer release. That being said, I do not think that your reconstruction looks very reliable. If you check the orientations of your retained austenite and compare with the reconstructed austenite, they often don't match. You also only have characterized parts of your austenite grains, for a good reconstruction it would be good to at least span a handful of grains. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Dear Jules,
I have tried to track your issue down and it is related to our limited focus on microstructures that have retained austenite, i.e. austenite that is not reconstructed from martensite. I have now implemented some bugfixes to make things work for you, you should download the latest ORTools developer release.
That being said, I do not think that your reconstruction looks very reliable. If you check the orientations of your retained austenite and compare with the reconstructed austenite, they often don't match. You also only have characterized parts of your austenite grains, for a good reconstruction it would be good to at least span a handful of grains.