Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vulnerable ssleay32.dll in OCS Inventory Agent (CVE-2022-0778) #290

Open
Vancco opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Vulnerable ssleay32.dll in OCS Inventory Agent (CVE-2022-0778) #290

Vancco opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@Vancco
Copy link

Vancco commented Feb 4, 2025

Hello OCS Inventory Team,

We have identified that the OCS Inventory Agent includes a vulnerable version of ssleay32.dll in its installation folder:

  • File path: C:\Program Files\OCS Inventory Agent\ssleay32.dll
  • Detected version: 1.0.2r
  • Vulnerability: CVE-2022-0778 (affects OpenSSL versions >= 1.0.2, < 1.0.2zd)

Could you confirm if this issue has been addressed in the latest version of the OCS Agent? If not, is there an update planned to replace the affected DLL?

Thank you for your assistance.

Best regards,

@gillesdubois
Copy link
Member

Hi @Vancco

After investigating the issue, it doesn't seems we use the impacted function in our agent.
Nonetheless, we are going to provide an updated agent with openssl 1.0.2zd.

Thanks a lot for your feedback !

Regards,
Gilles DUBOIS.

@Vancco
Copy link
Author

Vancco commented Feb 12, 2025

Dear Gilles,

Thank you for your prompt response and for investigating the issue. I appreciate your efforts in planning to update the agent with OpenSSL 1.0.2zd.

Given that the impacted function isn't utilized in the agent, would it be feasible to remove the vulnerable DLL entirely? This could potentially simplify the codebase and eliminate any associated security risks.

Thank you once again for your attention to this matter.

Best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants