Skip to content

How to achieve sota performance as shown in Table 2 #5

@MichaelYu781

Description

@MichaelYu781

Hi,

Thanks for this impressive work

I have a question regarding the Linear Probing performance. I noticed that the results reported in Table 2 are significantly better than the curves shown in Figure 5(a).

I am aware that Table 2 utilizes a symmetric ViT (Pixel Decoder) instead of the lightweight (4-layer) decoder. My understanding is that a symmetric/heavier decoder is primarily beneficial for reconstruction quality (rFID). However, it is surprising to see it lead to such a massive improvement in Linear Probing (representation quality) as well.

Does the symmetric decoder alone account for this performance gap?

Could you kindly clarify the training setup for Table 2? Specifically, how much data and how much training data was required?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions