Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISO-639 mga (Middle Irish) and ghc (Hiberno-Scottish Gaelic) #1031

Closed
silmeth opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

ISO-639 mga (Middle Irish) and ghc (Hiberno-Scottish Gaelic) #1031

silmeth opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@silmeth
Copy link

silmeth commented Apr 21, 2023

Those codes are not associated with any language system.

mga is ISO-639-2 code for Middle Irish (Gaelic dialects of ~900–1200, the stage after Old Irish – sharing its written tradition, some Old Irish texts being preserved in Middle Irish manuscripts), ghc is an ISO-639-3 code for “Hiberno-Scottish Gaelic” which is a name given by Ethnologue to Classical Gaelic or Classical Irish – the standardized language of Gaelic poetry of ~1200–1750.¹

So it would make sense to me to:

  • add mga to SGA (Old Irish) Language System Tag,
  • add ghc to IRT (Irish Traditional) system,
  • or add separate Language Systems for those stages of Irish/Gaelic.

Lack of association for those codes causes texts using the insular (“Gaelic”) type in HTML elements marked with lang="mga" or lang="ghc" to render incorrectly using Junicode 2 font, see psb1558/Junicode-font#170


¹ Ethnologue 15, p. 565:

Gaelic, Hiberno-Scottish (Gaoidhealg, Hiberno-Scottish Classical Common Gaelic) [ghc] Extinct. Ireland and Scotland. Class: Indo-European, Celtic, Insular, Goidelic. Lg Dev: Roman script. Bible: 1690. Other: Archaic literary language based on 12th century Irish, formerly used by professional classes in Ireland until the 17th century and Scotland until the 18th century. vso.

@PeterCon PeterCon self-assigned this Jan 20, 2024
@PeterCon
Copy link
Collaborator

See the OT 1.9.1 alpha for draft revisions addressing this issue.

@silmeth
Copy link
Author

silmeth commented Mar 28, 2024

Thanks! It looks OK to me.

@PeterCon PeterCon added this to the OpenType 1.9.1 milestone Apr 16, 2024
@PeterCon
Copy link
Collaborator

This is fixed in OT 1.9.1. See the OT 1.9.1 beta for draft revisions addressing this issue. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants