-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
The path to solving memory problems #57 #62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@jean-louquetin Hey! Sorry to bother you, but do you by any chance have a dataset for testing this PR+issue? With my data, I don't see any problems overall. |
|
Hey @MiXaiLL76 , I don't have much time to check but probably if you take the cvpr dataset and some yolo model, you will see either that there is no nano/micro objects, or you will have the metrics for this yolo version ! |
|
I tested with VisDrone dataset, on the train split and got these: Meaning there are nano and micro (not -1 value) but the detection of yolo (I used yolo12n) was very bad on those ranges ! |
pycocotoolsfaster-coco-eval==1.6.7 (separate_eval=False (default)faster-coco-eval>=1.7.0 (separate_eval=False (default) |
|
@MiXaiLL76 |
The path to solving memory problems.
#57