Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Covariance matrix? #4

Open
facontidavide opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Covariance matrix? #4

facontidavide opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@facontidavide
Copy link

Hi,

first of all, fantastic work. I tested this and got very good results (much better than RF2O)

I wonder which are your thought about defining a covariance matrix, to allow a EKF algorithm to fuse this odometry with another one (wheels).

As it could be expected, this method fails in the case of a long corridor with no features. This is obvious and I don't think we can/should do anything about that. But it would be interesting to detect this at run-time and update the covariance matrix accordingly.

What do you think?

@artivis
Copy link

artivis commented May 20, 2021

Hi,

If I'm not mistaken, the covariance matrix of the odometry increment is readily available (see cov_odo).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants