You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A stupid question: what is log_ps compared to the number of identical samples in the output ?
If Ni counts the number (frequency) of identical samples for each unique parameter set i, I expect that exp(log_ps) is the probably to find sample i in the output, and that is is equal to Ni (once normalized, and after burning half of the samples). Is it correct ?
Does it means that the convergence is not reached ? I have to admin that my GR stats are close to 1.2 but some are above.
The correlated question is how to I select the "best" parameter set. Should I take that with max(log_ps) or the most frequent in the sampled set ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A stupid question: what is log_ps compared to the number of identical samples in the output ?
If Ni counts the number (frequency) of identical samples for each unique parameter set i, I expect that exp(log_ps) is the probably to find sample i in the output, and that is is equal to Ni (once normalized, and after burning half of the samples). Is it correct ?
Does it means that the convergence is not reached ? I have to admin that my GR stats are close to 1.2 but some are above.
The correlated question is how to I select the "best" parameter set. Should I take that with max(log_ps) or the most frequent in the sampled set ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: