question on the paper

[xuans29]

请问作者，为何论文中figure 8的结果展示中将Chesapeake Bay dataset中地物分为四类，是为了与上文中的PolandDataset结果保持种类一致吗？是否将不属于tree、vegetation、water的其余地物都归类为build-up类了？谢谢

may I ask why Figure 8 in the paper shows the Chesapeake Bay dataset divided into four classes? Is this done to keep the number of categories consistent with the Poland Dataset results mentioned earlier? Were all other land cover types, excluding tree, vegetation, and water, grouped under the build-up class? Thank you.

[LiZhuoHong]

Hi, I highly recommend that you check the supplementary material of this Paper. There is a class unified table.
The main reason for unifying the classes is that we can only obtain the 5-class 1-meter ground truth from the Chesapeake Bay dataset. You can also check thorough our ISPRS Journal, the same issue is explained in it.