Named Pipe on windows

[Mattwmaster58]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In my head, named pipes are a lower overhead way of communication compared to eg TCP over loopback interface. I don't have a scenario where local network isn't sufficient, but I was curious of the feasibility of this (as have many others for other RPC libs)

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be cool to be able to do this over named pipe. I'm not sure what "layer" this would best implemented in. Ktor plugin? lower than ktor?

Describe alternatives you've considered
websockets on loopback interface - it's fine, I was just curious on the feasibility of named pipes, and what the best approach might be for someone desiring named pipe access would be.

Additional context
N/A

[lukewarlow]

Assuming you control both ends in kotlin and so can use krpc protocol, I think this would be best as an implementation of KRpcTransport?

[Mr3zee]

@Mattwmaster58 I agree with what @lukewarlow said. However it might not be ergonomic enough, though if you try - I would be curious for your feedback