You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes, it is very difficult to determine why a line is either partially covered or not covered at all
This is usually due to the fact that Kover reports on bytecode-level coverage, but then displays the coverage on top of the source code
With the ability to view which lines of bytecode are covered / not covered, it should be substantially easier to determine which paths through the code are actually untested
e.g. I'm currently trying to determine how the following coverage occurs:
It could be a bug with Kover, or it could be a weird path through the code that's been mapped strangely to the source code, or it could be something else - the ability to see bytecode coverage would allow this sort of thing to be diagnosed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sometimes, it is very difficult to determine why a line is either partially covered or not covered at all
This is usually due to the fact that Kover reports on bytecode-level coverage, but then displays the coverage on top of the source code
With the ability to view which lines of bytecode are covered / not covered, it should be substantially easier to determine which paths through the code are actually untested
e.g. I'm currently trying to determine how the following coverage occurs:
It could be a bug with Kover, or it could be a weird path through the code that's been mapped strangely to the source code, or it could be something else - the ability to see bytecode coverage would allow this sort of thing to be diagnosed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: