Skip to content

Design of Str #53

@bkamins

Description

@bkamins

I understand why Str needs the internal fields like cache etc. (100% support 👍) but I do not understand why their types have to be in a signature and not be fixed - what is the value of this flexibility?

In short why the signature struct Str{T} <: AbstractString is not enough for this type?
`

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions