Further deob renaming work

[tritao]

Hey @GregHib, would you be open to PR contributions to further rename the client?

I was thinking it could be done by leaving the original deob source, and then having a renamed and refactored client, that is driven 100% using an AST transformation framework, so it can always be recreated idempotently (so we can easily review it, and make sure it matches the original work).

If you think that could be interesting, I can send a few PRs.

[GregHib]

Hey yeah I have a manual refactoring branch which I essentially use for the same reason, I refactor what I need and reference it when making small changes to the original

[GregHib]

Created ast-refactor

[tritao]

Thanks, by the way I tried starting from your refactoring branch, but it's currently broken as the client launches but does not get to game correctly.

So I am thinking of just rebasing all the changes to main instead, but that will lose your previous refactorings. I think it's probably for the best so we can a fully data-driven refactor approach going on. Is that ok?

[GregHib]

Yeah I don't try and keep refactoring functional so it makes sense to start on a different branch. ast-refactor is a branch off of main which you can use and that way it can be merged in. None of these changes will go into main as that's to be kept as untouched as possible. Alternatively you could also complete the bulk of the work on a fork and it can all be merged in at a later point