Replies: 1 comment
-
|
hi @JiayiLi21, Assuming you're working on m6anet 2.0.1:
Let me know how it goes and if you need more clarification on this Best regards, Christopher Hendra |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi developers,
I have tried your package and workflow on an IVT dataset (A combined version of 0% modification on all U and 100% modification on all U) with labels of individual reads available.
Could you give some suggestions on how to rewrite parts of your source code to achieve read-level detection (with labels available)? To be more specific, I want to train the loss function between individual read probability and read-level label, after which the site-level modification ratio is returned.

Above is a schematic of my anticipated change. I have read through your codes and plan to add additional information for reads corresponding to a given site in the variable data_info for the dataset and data loader, but still confused about how to change the package efficiently without influencing other functionality. Could you please give some suggestions and useful entry points? Many thanks in advance.
Best,
Jiayi
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions