Hi
I am working on 0.7.3 still for the moment. I am not sure if this is a issue, or a lack of documentation, or just me just not knowing how to do it. When using the filter node, I would like to be able to have one node that can accept multiple items. A few few example:
Ex1: Spend Cat != "COGS" and Spend Cat !="Rebates"
Ex2: Cost Center = 1000 and Ledger = "Budget"
If this can already be done, it would be helpful to have logic that shows how to do it because when I use the advanced editor and put it in like that (the python way), it never works for me. Thats why I am not sure if it's a bug or just my lack of knowing how to do it.
Additionally, and this is more of a feature that I believe would greatly improve efficiency. It would be nice if the Filter node could have two output nodes. One where the data is true in the filter, and another where the data is false. You don't always need to steam the data from both to some location but having the option to be able to do that without having to set up two independent filters with opposing logic would make workflows cleaner that need this. It is very common that I am using a filter to split off a subset of data for special handling before putting a union in there to put the data back together.
Thank you for all your amazing work.
Hi
I am working on 0.7.3 still for the moment. I am not sure if this is a issue, or a lack of documentation, or just me just not knowing how to do it. When using the filter node, I would like to be able to have one node that can accept multiple items. A few few example:
Ex1: Spend Cat != "COGS" and Spend Cat !="Rebates"
Ex2: Cost Center = 1000 and Ledger = "Budget"
If this can already be done, it would be helpful to have logic that shows how to do it because when I use the advanced editor and put it in like that (the python way), it never works for me. Thats why I am not sure if it's a bug or just my lack of knowing how to do it.
Additionally, and this is more of a feature that I believe would greatly improve efficiency. It would be nice if the Filter node could have two output nodes. One where the data is true in the filter, and another where the data is false. You don't always need to steam the data from both to some location but having the option to be able to do that without having to set up two independent filters with opposing logic would make workflows cleaner that need this. It is very common that I am using a filter to split off a subset of data for special handling before putting a union in there to put the data back together.
Thank you for all your amazing work.