Thank you for your interest in contributing to our development documentation system! This document provides guidelines for contributing effectively and maintaining high standards.
- Code of Conduct
- Getting Started
- Development Workflow
- Commit Message Standards
- Pull Request Process
- Documentation Standards
- Testing Requirements
- Review Process
- Professional Communication: Be respectful and constructive in all interactions
- Inclusive Environment: Welcome contributors from all backgrounds and experience levels
- Quality Focus: Maintain high standards for code and documentation quality
- Collaborative Spirit: Work together to improve the project for everyone
- Harassment, discrimination, or offensive language
- Spam, trolling, or disruptive behavior
- Violation of intellectual property rights
- Deliberate introduction of security vulnerabilities
- Git: Latest version for version control
- Node.js: 18+ for development tools
- Editor: VS Code with recommended extensions
- Knowledge: Familiarity with the technology stack you're contributing to
-
Fork the Repository
# Fork on GitHub, then clone your fork git clone https://github.com/your-username/docs.git cd docs
-
Install Dependencies
npm install
-
Set Up Pre-commit Hooks
npm run setup-hooks
-
Verify Setup
npm run verify-setup
# Install recommended VS Code extensions
code --install-extension esbenp.prettier-vscode
code --install-extension dbaeumer.vscode-eslint
code --install-extension ms-vscode.vscode-typescript-next
code --install-extension christian-kohler.path-intellisense# Always start from main
git checkout main
git pull origin main
# Create feature branch
git checkout -b feat/your-feature-name
# Or for bug fixes
git checkout -b fix/your-bug-description
# For documentation
git checkout -b docs/your-doc-updatefeat/- New featuresfix/- Bug fixesdocs/- Documentation updatesstyle/- Code style changesrefactor/- Code refactoringtest/- Adding or updating testschore/- Maintenance tasksperf/- Performance improvementsci/- CI/CD changesbuild/- Build system changesrevert/- Reverting changesdeps/- Dependency updatessecurity/- Security-related changes
feat/testing): add comprehensive E2E testing guidelines
fix(typescript): resolve path alias configuration issues
docs(readme): update navigation with role-based sections
style(eslint): enforce absolute import patterns
refactor(security): improve JWT implementation
test(react): add component testing examples
chore(deps): update dependencies to latest versions
perf(bundle): optimize bundle size with tree shaking
ci(github): add automated security scanning
build(webpack): configure path aliases for all build tools
revert(typescript): revert to relative imports for compatibility
deps(security): update vulnerable dependencies
security(auth): implement rate limiting for login attemptsThis project follows the Conventional Commits specification.
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
feat |
New features | feat(auth): add OAuth2 authentication |
fix |
Bug fixes | fix(api): resolve CORS configuration issue |
docs |
Documentation | docs(readme): update installation instructions |
style |
Code style | style(eslint): enforce consistent formatting |
refactor |
Code refactoring | refactor(components): extract reusable hooks |
test |
Testing | test(security): add authentication tests |
chore |
Maintenance | chore(deps): update dependencies |
perf |
Performance | perf(bundle): optimize webpack configuration |
ci |
CI/CD | ci(github): add automated testing workflow |
build |
Build system | build(webpack): configure path aliases |
revert |
Revert changes | revert(typescript): revert import changes |
deps |
Dependencies | deps(security): update vulnerable packages |
security |
Security | security(auth): implement rate limiting |
(auth)- Authentication related(api)- API related(docs)- Documentation(typescript)- TypeScript specific(react)- React specific(testing)- Testing related(security)- Security related(performance)- Performance related(build)- Build system(ci)- CI/CD pipeline
- Use imperative mood: "add" not "added" or "adds"
- Don't capitalize first letter: "add authentication" not "Add authentication"
- No period at the end: "add authentication" not "add authentication."
- Keep it concise: Under 72 characters
- Be specific: "add JWT authentication" not "add auth"
- Explain what and why: Not how
- Use imperative mood: "change" not "changed"
- Include motivation: Why this change was made
- Reference issues: "Closes #123" or "Fixes #456"
- Breaking changes: Start with
BREAKING CHANGE: - Issue references: "Closes #123", "Fixes #456"
- Co-authored-by: For multiple contributors
# Simple feature
feat(auth): add JWT authentication
# Feature with body
feat(api): add user management endpoints
Add comprehensive CRUD operations for user management including
create, read, update, and delete operations with proper validation
and error handling.
Closes #123
# Breaking change
feat(typescript)!: enforce absolute imports
BREAKING CHANGE: Relative imports are no longer allowed. All imports
must use absolute paths with @ alias.
Migration guide: docs/migration/v1.0.0.md
# Multiple issues
fix(security): prevent XSS attacks in user input
- Add input sanitization for all user inputs
- Implement DOMPurify for HTML content
- Add validation for email and URL fields
Fixes #456
Closes #789
# Co-authored commit
feat(testing): add comprehensive E2E test suite
Co-authored-by: John Doe <john@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Jane Smith <jane@example.com>-
Update Documentation
# Update relevant documentation npm run docs:update -
Run Tests
# Run all tests npm test # Run specific test suites npm run test:unit npm run test:integration npm run test:e2e
-
Check Code Quality
# Lint code npm run lint # Format code npm run format # Type check npm run type-check
-
Update Changelog
# Add entry to CHANGELOG.md # Follow the format in the existing changelog
## Description
Brief description of changes made.
## Type of Change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Performance improvement
- [ ] Security enhancement
## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] E2E tests pass
- [ ] Manual testing completed
- [ ] Security testing completed
## Documentation
- [ ] Code is documented
- [ ] README is updated
- [ ] CHANGELOG is updated
- [ ] API documentation is updated
## Checklist
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published
## Related Issues
Closes #123
Fixes #456-
Automated Checks
- All CI/CD checks pass
- Code coverage meets requirements
- Security scan passes
- Performance benchmarks pass
-
Manual Review
- Code review completed
- Security review completed
- Documentation review completed
- Testing review completed
-
Approval Requirements
- At least 2 approvals from maintainers
- All automated checks pass
- No security vulnerabilities
- Documentation is complete and accurate
- Clear and Concise: Write for the target audience
- Comprehensive: Cover all necessary information
- Accurate: Ensure all information is correct and up-to-date
- Consistent: Follow established patterns and terminology
- Accessible: Use clear language and proper formatting
- Use Markdown: All documentation should be in Markdown format
- Include Examples: Provide practical code examples
- Cross-Reference: Link to related documentation
- Version Information: Include version compatibility notes
- Migration Guides: Provide clear migration paths for breaking changes
- Introduction: Explain what the document covers
- Prerequisites: List any requirements or setup needed
- Step-by-Step Instructions: Provide clear, numbered steps
- Examples: Include practical, working examples
- Troubleshooting: Address common issues and solutions
- References: Link to additional resources
- Unit Tests: 80%+ coverage for critical paths
- Integration Tests: All API endpoints and workflows
- E2E Tests: Critical user journeys
- Security Tests: Authentication, authorization, and input validation
- Performance Tests: Load testing and performance benchmarks
- Write Tests First: Follow TDD when possible
- Meaningful Tests: Test behavior, not implementation
- Isolated Tests: Each test should be independent
- Descriptive Names: Use clear, descriptive test names
- Proper Assertions: Use appropriate assertion methods
// Good test example
describe('UserService', () => {
describe('createUser', () => {
it('should create user with valid data', async () => {
const userData = {
name: 'John Doe',
email: 'john@example.com',
password: 'SecurePass123!'
};
const result = await UserService.createUser(userData);
expect(result).toMatchObject({
id: expect.any(String),
name: userData.name,
email: userData.email,
createdAt: expect.any(Date)
});
});
it('should throw error for invalid email', async () => {
const userData = {
name: 'John Doe',
email: 'invalid-email',
password: 'SecurePass123!'
};
await expect(UserService.createUser(userData))
.rejects
.toThrow('Invalid email address');
});
});
});- Functionality: Does the code work as intended?
- Security: Are there any security vulnerabilities?
- Performance: Are there any performance issues?
- Maintainability: Is the code easy to understand and maintain?
- Testing: Are there adequate tests?
- Documentation: Is the code properly documented?
- Standards: Does the code follow project standards?
- Accessibility: Are accessibility requirements met?
- Input Validation: Are all inputs properly validated?
- Authentication: Are authentication mechanisms secure?
- Authorization: Are authorization checks in place?
- Data Protection: Is sensitive data properly protected?
- Error Handling: Do errors not expose sensitive information?
- Dependencies: Are dependencies up-to-date and secure?
- Accuracy: Is all information correct and up-to-date?
- Completeness: Are all necessary topics covered?
- Clarity: Is the content clear and easy to understand?
- Consistency: Does it follow established patterns?
- Examples: Are there practical examples provided?
- Links: Are all links working and relevant?
- All tests pass
- Documentation is updated
- Changelog is updated
- Security scan passes
- Performance benchmarks pass
- Code review is complete
- Dependencies are up-to-date
-
Create Release Branch
git checkout -b release/v1.0.0
-
Update Version
npm version patch|minor|major
-
Update Changelog
# Move unreleased changes to new version # Update release date
-
Create Pull Request
git push origin release/v1.0.0 # Create PR for review -
Merge and Tag
git checkout main git merge release/v1.0.0 git tag v1.0.0 git push origin main --tags
-
Deploy
npm run deploy
- Issues: Use GitHub issues for bug reports and feature requests
- Discussions: Use GitHub discussions for questions and ideas
- Security: Use security@example.com for security issues
- Documentation: Use docs@example.com for documentation questions
- Project Documentation: docs/README.md
- Development Standards: docs/development/
- Testing Guidelines: docs/testing/
- Security Standards: docs/security/
- New Contributors: Ask for help in discussions or issues
- Code Reviews: Request reviews from experienced contributors
- Pair Programming: Arrange pair programming sessions
- Documentation: Help improve documentation for others
Thank you for contributing! π
Your contributions help make this project better for everyone. We appreciate your time and effort in maintaining high standards and following these guidelines.
Last Updated: January 15, 2024
Maintainer: Development Standards Team