-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The local results are poor #7
Comments
Hi @whw2021 , Thank you for your question. I tried our upload code. Please enlarge the epoch to 45 and this problem should be solved. Best, |
@ChenHongruixuan I am trying it on new sample. Could you please help me on how to fix the below error?
|
Thank you for your response. Following your advice, I indeed achieved good results on the shuguang dataset, but the performance on other datasets is still very poor. For example, the following figure shows the local and nonlocal results I obtained on Gloucester, which are far from what is presented in your paper. I would like to understand why this is the case and hope to receive your explanation. |
The following are the results I obtained after executing the file train_SRGCAE_Local.py.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2581/a2581a2aecfc23a0f1f272f13615809efdcd6ed5" alt="SRGCAE_EdgeConc_DI"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ce24/8ce24595e8a35d53e089819da2d0094321658f92" alt="SRGCAE_EdgeConc_1725586470 5939867"
I didn't adjust the parameters; why is the performance so poor?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: