Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

record attribute 'NAGPRA category' - private? #197

Closed
1 task done
dustymc opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

record attribute 'NAGPRA category' - private? #197

dustymc opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Mar 5, 2025

Help us understand your request (check below):

  • other

Describe what you're trying to do

#160 will

We could make the following adjustments:

  1. Do nothing if the encumbrance is no longer required
  2. Change the attribute to private
  3. Add a new private attribute and split the data

I will proceed by changing the attribute to private (Option 2) if there's no other guidance when this goes to production. Adjustments can be made if our developing usage guidance or further review warrants them.

I can provide summary data by request.

Summary:



 guid_prefix | count 
-------------+-------
 UAM:Arc     |   625
 UAM:EH      |    14


Ping:

@sjshirar
@AJLinn

@AJLinn
Copy link

AJLinn commented Mar 6, 2025

Change the attribute to private

I fully support changing the NAGPRA attribute to private and it should stay a private attribute because it has an associated code table and we need to search on it.

@dustymc dustymc transferred this issue from ArctosDB/arctos Mar 6, 2025
@dustymc dustymc added this to the pre-release milestone Mar 6, 2025
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Mar 13, 2025

encumbrance stash:

temp_mask_NAGPRA_category_sharable.zip

@dustymc dustymc closed this as completed Mar 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants