Non-roof landuse not mapped

[schoeller]

Dear all,

thanks for this opensource.

When executing

./GisToSWMM5 raster_dem.asc raster_flowdir.asc raster_landuse.asc table_catchment_props.csv table_junctions.csv table_conduits.csv table_outfalls.csv table_header.csv table_evaporation.csv table_temperature.csv table_snowpacks.csv table_raingages.csv table_inflows.csv table_timeseries.csv table_pumps.csv table_curves.csv table_storage.csv table_dwf.csv table_patterns.csv table_losses.csv table_xsection.csv table_report.csv table_symbols.csv test/out 1

I receive

Report:
-> Running time: 0.137109 minutes
-> Total number of cells: 146
-> Number of active cells: 146
-> Catchment area: 5.6865 ha
-> Catchment average elevation: 0 m
-> Catchment average slope: 0
-> Landuse information (code, number of cells, area in ha, % of catchment):
        10      54      2.3627  41.5493
        12      51      1.9307  33.9523
        14      41      1.3931  24.4984
        26      0       0       0
        30      0       0       0
        32      0       0       0
        34      0       0       0
        60      0       0       0
        62      0       0       0
        64      0       0       0

This means that no non-roof landuse cells are mapped. The table_catchment_props.csv reads

id,imperv,dst_imp,n_imper,dst_per,n_perv,percz_i,rain_ga,conduct,initdef,suction,Snowpacks,Tag
10,100,0.87,0.012,0.87,0.012,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_nonplowable,Dach
12,100,0.87,0.012,0.87,0.012,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_nonplowable,Kiesdach
14,100,0.87,0.012,0.87,0.012,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_nonplowable,Gründach
26,100,0.87,0.012,0.87,0.012,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_nonplowable,Container
30,100,0.42,0.011,0.42,0.011,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_plowable,Asphalt
32,100,0.39,0.02,0.39,0.02,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_plowable,Pflaster
34,100,4.22,0.238,4.22,0.238,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_nonplowable,Senke
60,0,4.22,0.238,4.22,0.238,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_per,Grünfläche
62,0,4.22,0.238,4.22,0.238,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_per,Wald
64,100,4.22,0.238,4.22,0.238,0,STA01,4.21,0.217,88.9,sp_imp_nonplowable,Wasser

Header of raster_flowdir.asc

ncols        470
nrows        358
xllcorner    3476805.690999999642
yllcorner    5532655.959999999031
cellsize     1.000000000000
NODATA_value 247
 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ]

Header of raster_landuse.asc

ncols        466
nrows        490
xllcorner    3476809.000000000000
yllcorner    5532523.000000000000
cellsize     1.000000000000
NODATA_value  nan
 nan nan nan nan nan nan nan nan nan

Any hints very much appreciated.

Best regards

Sebastian

[schoeller]

Corrected the input rasters to contain equal cols/rows, but still not working:

DEM:

ncols        470
nrows        358
xllcorner    3476805.690999999642
yllcorner    5532655.959999999031
cellsize     1.000000000000
NODATA_value  -9999
 -9999.0 -9999 -9999 -9999 

FLOWDIR:

ncols        470
nrows        358
xllcorner    3476805.690999999642
yllcorner    5532655.959999999031
cellsize     1.000000000000
NODATA_value 255
 255 255 255 255 255 255

LANDUSE:

ncols        470
nrows        358
xllcorner    3476805.690999999642
yllcorner    5532655.959999999031
cellsize     1.000000000000
NODATA_value  nan
 nan nan nan nan nan nan

Output:

...
-> Error, no data to calculate slope between cells 168213 and 167743.
-> Error, no data to calculate slope between cells 168214 and 167743.
...
-> Running time: 0.0958115 minutes
-> Total number of cells: 146
-> Number of active cells: 146
-> Catchment area: 5.6865 ha
-> Catchment average elevation: 0 m
-> Catchment average slope: 0
-> Landuse information (code, number of cells, area in ha, % of catchment):
        10      54      2.3597  41.4965
        12      51      1.9333  33.9981
        14      41      1.3935  24.5054
        26      0       0       0
        30      0       0       0
        32      0       0       0
        34      0       0       0
        60      0       0       0
        62      0       0       0
        64      0       0       0

[siamak6566]

Dear @schoeller
I have the same issue. Please let me know if you find any solution for this problem.