-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Debate AI Architecture Proposal (Microservices Architecture) #20
Comments
please include graphql to make sure to fetching and sending necessary data to end-user, here what I mean
else all seems workable.. please Let me know how did you get this @ParagGhatage |
Hey @adilkadivala , |
Let's make it togather @ParagGhatage |
This issue seems pretty interesting, I have a bit of experience with system design so I can help here if you want, also I think some of the things can be over-optimization for now if the users are less, we also need to think about the cost of deploying these many services, what goal organization is planning to achieve with this application, do they even want to deploy it for public use right now etc, would love to know your thoughts further on this! |
@Rishab87 , Thanks for the time that you have invested in reviewing this issue. |
Description
This is a proposal for the architecture of the AI Debate Tool aimed at helping users improve their debating skills through interaction with an AI. The architecture includes model selection, technologies for backend and frontend, as well as possible future features like real-time debates.
High-Level Architecture Overview
1. Frontend:
2. Backend:
3. AI Logic Layer:
4. Database:
5. Future Possibility (User vs User Debate):
6. Deployment:
Directory structure -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: