Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TTF without B&W variants? #36

Closed
Tricertops opened this issue Feb 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

TTF without B&W variants? #36

Tricertops opened this issue Feb 9, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@Tricertops
Copy link

You include this warning with every release:

The font works in all operating systems, but will currently only show color emoji in Firefox, Thunderbird, Photoshop CC 2017, and Windows Edge V38.14393+. This is not a limitation of the font, but of the operating systems and applications. Regular B&W outline emoji are included for backwards/fallback compatibility.

Why don’t you build a TTF file without the B&W variants, so the font works everywhere?

@Crissov
Copy link

Crissov commented Feb 9, 2018

That is not how this works. It is currently impossible to build a single font file that would provide color glyphs on all platforms that support color fonts at all, because there are four different (but standardized) ways to do color glyphs.

@Tricertops
Copy link
Author

Tricertops commented Feb 9, 2018

I just find it funny that you/they offer special TTF file for OSX, that doesn’t work in native apps or Safari.

@Crissov
Copy link

Crissov commented Feb 9, 2018

If I remember correctly, @eosrei has stated several times that he would like to add generating an SBIX variant to the build process but hasn't had the time or expertise to actually do it.

@13rac1
Copy link
Owner

13rac1 commented Feb 10, 2018

😆 It's just the time. I've got the expertise. 😉 It's not high on my priority list because I run Linux, not MacOS. I will do it someday if someone else doesn't... I've been building many things with LEDs and C & C++ lately instead.

Previous SBIX release question is #35 So this is a dupe.

@13rac1 13rac1 closed this as completed Feb 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants