Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Technically I have nothing against that, question is how to implement it. Apps like Portainer, Dockge and what they are all called will never work with this proxy, because they need to manipulate the entire Docker stack to work, but if an app just needs to stop and start existing containers, without the right to create new ones, that’s a valid use case and option for this kind of proxy. I’ll give it a go when I have time, I don’t know the Docker API by heart but it should only be a few endpoints and verbs that need to pass to allow start, stop of existing containers. By the way. You don’t need to stop containers to take a backup of their volumes. For databases or other apps that keep data in RAM, you should always use their capabilities first, like in my 11notes/postgres image for instance. For the actual container data, reside your volumes on a CoW filesystem like XFS, and you can simply copy all data via |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, first of all thank you very much for the nice work. I like the idea of using your docker socket proxy to first of all reduce memory footprint but also improve security.
I was wondering, would you be willing to have a version that also exposes the capability of perform write actions to the socket?
To support my case I have to use cases that I currently deploy on my system:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions